Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-11-06 |
| -- | 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| -- | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 266 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A42 has a global score of 87, which is slightly better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s general score of 79.2. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A42 has older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version.
Galaxy A42 counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A42, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A42 has a much better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A42, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a better resolution camera and a much better video definition.
Galaxy A42 features a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 6 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.