Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-01-13 |
| -- | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| -- | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 424 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), having a 79.2 score against 75.8. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) body is much newer and way thinner than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, but it's much heavier. Galaxy A5 (2017) has a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a really smaller display.
The Galaxy A5 (2017) has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 13 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos, a lot more mega-pixels camera and a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.