Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 general score. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller screen. Galaxy A50 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with improved battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has an 18 percent larger battery size.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better video quality and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.