Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-10-20 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s overall score of 79.2. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A50s features an incredibly better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a much better video resolution, a camera in the back with more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has greater battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.