Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-12-27 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 general score. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. Galaxy A51 has a much better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display.
Galaxy A51 features a much better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A51, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better images and video in low-light situations, a way higher video definition and a higher resolution back camera.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A51, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has longer battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has an 18 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.