Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-04-29 |
| -- | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a score of 90.8 against 79.2. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features an incredibly better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures, a much better video quality and a more megapixels back-facing camera.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 4 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.