Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 overall score. Galaxy A52 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display.
The Galaxy A52 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.