Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a general score of 91.3 against 79.2. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.