Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-09-01 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a 91.1 score against 79.2. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a very superior performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A52s features a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A52s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52s also has a way better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.