Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 14 |
| 2025-04-24 | -- |
| 7.02 ounces | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 399 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | -- |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), getting a 79.2 score against 78.7. These phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a newer 15 version while Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has Android 14, counting with some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has 8 GB more RAM. Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), and although they both have a 50 mega-pixels back-facing camera and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a much higher video definition. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because it has more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) counts with a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.