Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-05-22 |
| -- | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| -- | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 294 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a global score of 79.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A6's 75.8 overall score. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a way newer and noticeably thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A6, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A6 features a very superior performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 13 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A6 counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a much smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and video in low light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.