Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-01-13 |
| -- | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a little bit better than Galaxy A7 (2017), having a 79.2 score against 75.8. Even though Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit heavier than Galaxy A7 (2017), it's incredibly thinner and also newer. Galaxy A7 (2017) features a much faster CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features a much better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has better battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 31% larger battery size. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a lot higher video resolution, a camera with way more megapixels and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.