Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| -- | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an overall score of 79.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 score. Although Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A70, it's way thinner and incredibly newer. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a more recent 15 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and improved performance.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher video resolution. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A70, because it has a 4 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.