Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 global score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a much better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A71, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A71 has a lot better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. Samsung Galaxy A71 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have a same size aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.