Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-11-15 |
| -- | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 392 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a general score of 85.2, which is a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s global score of 79.2. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller screen.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a much higher video resolution.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.