Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2025-04-24 | -- |
| -- | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| -- | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 312 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a general score of 79.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha's overall score of 76.3. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has 15 version and Samsung Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a noticeably thinner but way heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha.
The Galaxy Alpha has a lot better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a really smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Alpha has a very superior CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has 14 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional GPU.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations, a way better resolution camera in the back and a way higher video resolution. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.