Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-04-07 |
| -- | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than the Galaxy C7 Pro, having a 79.2 score against 78.4. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has 15 version while Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a notably newer and a lot thinner device than Galaxy C7 Pro, although it is somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy C7 Pro features an incredibly better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro features a very superior processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a much better video quality, a bigger aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.