Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-02-22 |
| -- | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s score of 79.2. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy F62 has 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy F62 features a very superior processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 4 lesser CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much less brightness and a quite smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F62, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 49 percent larger battery size. The Galaxy F62 features a camera that is just as good as Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s camera, and although the Galaxy F62 has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.