Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-09-27 |
| -- | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| -- | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 362 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 overall score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version, so it provides you some nice extra features and improved performance.
Galaxy Fold has a lot better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy Fold features a way better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a bit bigger display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera and a lot better video resolution.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) and Galaxy Fold feature incredibly similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have the same 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.