Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-02-05 |
| -- | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| -- | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a score of 79.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy M20's 78.9 general score. These phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a more recent 15 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version, so it provides some additional features. Although the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is just a little heavier than Galaxy M20, it's thinner and also notably newer.
Galaxy M20 features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy M20 has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4700mAh.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a greater camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.