Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-06-18 |
| -- | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| -- | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M40 has a score of 85, which is a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s global score of 79.2. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M40 has the older 10 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Galaxy M40 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy M40 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with much more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a way better battery performance than Galaxy M40, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.