Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 494 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s score of 79.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has worse 24 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.