Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is a little bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting an 81.2 score against 79.2. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has 4 lesser cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and videos and a lot higher video definition.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.