Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 5.1 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| -- | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 has a score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 overall score. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cpu cores (but faster).
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 448 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger camera aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited environments, a lot higher video definition and a camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.