Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-08-23 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 400 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having an 89 score against 79.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a really superior processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Note10 counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 34 percent greater battery size.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.