Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2013-09-25 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note3, with a 79.2 score against 77.7. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) construction is extremely newer and way thinner than the Galaxy Note3's, but it is also somewhat heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has older 15 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Galaxy Note3 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower number of cores and 13 GB less RAM. The Galaxy Note3 has a lot better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better camera than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video, a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a way higher video quality.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.