Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2014-09-29 |
| -- | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note4, with a 79.2 score against 77.6. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a noticeably newer and a lot thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note4, although it's also somewhat heavier. Galaxy Note4 features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen.
The Galaxy Note4 counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 46% bigger battery size. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior camera than Galaxy Note4, because it has a larger aperture, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.