Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| -- | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| -- | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 551 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is much better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a score of 88.3 against 79.2. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy S10 counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 3400mAh. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.