Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-05-16 |
| -- | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 502 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a 93.6 score against 79.2. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy S10 5G features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller screen.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10 5G has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.