Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| -- | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| -- | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 566 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a 94.8 score against 79.2. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has the older 13 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Galaxy S20 counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S20 has a lot better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 4700mAh battery size. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 7680x4320 video quality, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.