Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a 90.8 score against 79.2. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy S20 FE features a lot better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a much higher video quality. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.