Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 509 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 overall score. Both devices we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.