Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| -- | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 422 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a 93.4 score against 79.2. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has older 13 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Galaxy S22 features a very superior processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller screen and much lower brightness. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has worse 24 fps video frame rate, they both have a 50 MP camera in the back, a same size camera aperture and the same video quality. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.