Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| -- | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 501 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is way better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 overall score. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display and way darker screen.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4700mAh. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.