Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 14 |
| 2025-04-24 | -- |
| -- | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| -- | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 385 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an overall score of 79.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S24 FE's score of 76. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a a little bit lighter and incredibly thinner phone than the Galaxy S24 FE. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a newer 15 version while Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S24 FE, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 7 more megahertz processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much worse brightness and a little bit smaller screen.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features much more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S24 FE, because it has more internal memory. Galaxy S24 FE and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) have very similar battery performance. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. They have a back-facing camera with a 50 mega pixels resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.