Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2014-06-23 |
| -- | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 432 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a score of 79.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus's general score of 78.1. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the older 15 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2 version. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) design is way newer and noticeably thinner than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus's, although it's much heavier.
Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a much smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has 4 lesser cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Plus, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a back camera with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.