Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2014-06-23 |
| -- | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 432 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 7.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a general score of 79.2, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 global score. Even though Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is way heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, it's way thinner and also way newer. Both devices we compare here have Android OS, but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has older 15 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a much faster CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has 4 less processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a much smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a way better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a larger aperture, a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.