Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0 |
| 2025-04-24 | -- |
| -- | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active is a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with an 80.9 score against 79.2. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S6 Active has older 5.0 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a lot better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a way smaller screen.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has less RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits processing unit.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a bigger aperture, a way better resolution camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.