Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a 79.5 score against 79.2. The Galaxy S7 features a way better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot smaller screen and way less brightness. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy S7 has a very superior performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a lot better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better resolution camera and a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.