Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2016-06-10 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with a score of 79.2 against 75.8. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a incredibly newer and much thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, although it's just a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM and less processing cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active features a much better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a way smaller screen and way more opaque display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has better battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.