Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2025-04-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, with a score of 79.2 against 78.1. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has older 15 version while Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is incredibly heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, it's a lot thinner and extremely newer.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 4 less cores and 12 GB less RAM. The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a way better 50 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.