Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-08-11 |
| -- | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a little bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with an 81.9 score against 79.2. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features improved battery performance than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.