Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a general score of 83.3 against 79.2. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S9 features an incredibly better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 57 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.