Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-03-12 |
| -- | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.3 inches |
| -- | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| LTPO | LCD |
| -- | 311 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, with a global score of 79.2 against 78.1. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s design is a lot newer and way thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has 15 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy XCover 5 features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a way smaller screen.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a much better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 57 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.