Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-04-04 |
| -- | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPO | -- |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a general score of 80.1 against 79.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version, so it gives a couple additional features and performance tweaks.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a much smaller display. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking pictures in low-light environments, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.