Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | IPS LCD |
| -- | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s overall score of 79.2. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Galaxy XCover Pro has a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images and video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.