Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-08-11 |
| -- | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 425 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is just a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with an 85.6 score against 79.2. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a camera with way more megapixels.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.