Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-08-07 |
| -- | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 425 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a general score of 92.3 against 79.2. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a way better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 256 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) also has a lot higher video definition and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.