Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-08-11 |
| -- | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| -- | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| -- | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| LTPO | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 372 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is much better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 global score. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much powerful processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a bit bigger screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 256 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and video and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.