Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-05-12 |
| -- | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPO | AMOLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 830 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 general score. These phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a lot better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much lower brightness and a little bit smaller screen.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a battery lifetime that's very similar to the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) one. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit better camera than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a way higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.